RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS

投稿咨询

官方网站：http://link.springer.com/journal/11177

投稿网址：https://www.springer.com/biomed/human+genetics/journal/11177

PMC链接：http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1022-7954%5BISSN%5D

《俄罗斯遗传学杂志》是一本旨在为遗传学的发展做出重大贡献的杂志。该杂志发表理论和应用遗传学领域的评论和实验论文。它介绍了在分子、细胞、有机体和群体水平上的遗传过程的基础研究，包括遗传资源的保护和合理管理以及功能基因组学、进化基因组学和医学遗传学的问题。同行评审《俄罗斯遗传学杂志》是一份同行评议的期刊。我们使用单一的盲同行评审格式。我们的评审团队包括来自9个国家的600多名国内外评审人员(90%)。2017年从提交到首次评审的平均周期为5天，从首次评审到验收的平均周期为14天。2017年投稿退稿率为34%。接受发表文章的最终决定由编辑委员会作出。被邀请的审稿人因利益冲突，认为不符合审稿条件或者不能审稿的，应当及时通知审稿人，并予以拒绝。审稿人应以一种合理合理的方式清晰地阐述自己的观点，这样作者才能利用审稿人的观点来完善稿件。必须避免对作者的个人批评。评论者应该显示发表的一篇评论(我)任何相关的工作没有被引用的作者,(2)任何已报道在以前的出版物和没有适当的参考或引用,(2)任何实质性相似或重叠与其他手稿(发表或未发表)的个人知识。

Russian Journal of Genetics is a journal intended to make significant contribution to the development of genetics. The journal publishes reviews and experimental papers in the areas of theoretical and applied genetics. It presents fundamental research on genetic processes at molecular, cell, organism, and population levels, including problems of the conservation and rational management of genetic resources and the functional genomics, evolutionary genomics and medical genetics.PEER REVIEWRussian Journal of Genetics is a peer reviewed journal. We use a single blind peer review format. Our team of reviewers includes over 600 reviewers, both internal and external (90%), from 9 countries. The average period from submission to first decision in 2017 was 5 days, and that from first decision to acceptance was 14 days. The rejection rate for submitted manuscripts in 2017 was 34%. The final decision on the acceptance of an article for publication is made by the Editorial Board.Any invited reviewer who feels unqualified or unable to review the manuscript due to the conflict of interests should promptly notify the editors and decline the invitation. Reviewers should formulate their statements clearly in a sound and reasoned way so that authors can use reviewer’s arguments to improve the manuscript. Personal criticism of the authors must be avoided. Reviewers should indicate in a review (i) any relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors, (ii) anything that has been reported in previous publications and not given appropriate reference or citation, (ii) any substantial similarity or overlap with any other manuscript (published or unpublished) of which they have personal knowledge.