Russian Journal of Developmental Biology

投稿咨询

官方网站：http://www.springer.com/life+sciences/evolutionary+%26+developmental+biology/journal/11174

投稿网址：https://www.springer.com/life+sciences/evolutionary+&+developmental+biology/journal/11174

PMC链接：http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1062-3604%5BISSN%5D

《俄罗斯发育生物学杂志》是一本发表有关发育生物学各个方面的评论和实验文章的杂志。它介绍了在分子、细胞和有机体水平上发展、再生和致癌的基础和应用研究。同行评审《俄罗斯发育生物学杂志》是一份同行评议的期刊。我们使用双盲同行评审格式。我们的审稿人团队包括超过100名审稿人，包括内部审稿人和外部审稿人(80%)。2017年从提交到首次评审的平均周期为40天，从首次评审到验收的平均周期为90天。2017年投稿退稿率为55%。接受发表文章的最终决定由编辑委员会作出。被邀请的审稿人因利益冲突，认为不符合审稿条件或者不能审稿的，应当及时通知审稿人，并予以拒绝。审稿人应以一种合理合理的方式清晰地阐述自己的观点，这样作者才能利用审稿人的观点来完善稿件。必须避免对作者的个人批评。评论者应该显示发表的一篇评论(我)任何相关的工作没有被引用的作者,(2)任何已报道在以前的出版物和没有适当的参考或引用,(2)任何实质性相似或重叠与其他手稿(发表或未发表)的个人知识。

Russian Journal of Developmental Biology is a journal that publishes reviews and experimental articles dealing with various aspects of developmental biology. It presents fundamental and applied research on development, regeneration, and carcinogenesis at the molecular, cellular, and organismic levels.PEER REVIEWRussian Journal of Developmental Biology is a peer reviewed journal. We use a double blind peer review format. Our team of reviewers includes over 100 reviewers, both internal and external (80%). The average period from submission to first decision in 2017 was 40 days, and that from first decision to acceptance was 90 days. The rejection rate for submitted manuscripts in 2017 was 55%. The final decision on the acceptance of an article for publication is made by the Editorial Board.Any invited reviewer who feels unqualified or unable to review the manuscript due to the conflict of interests should promptly notify the editors and decline the invitation. Reviewers should formulate their statements clearly in a sound and reasoned way so that authors can use reviewer’s arguments to improve the manuscript. Personal criticism of the authors must be avoided. Reviewers should indicate in a review (i) any relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors, (ii) anything that has been reported in previous publications and not given appropriate reference or citation, (ii) any substantial similarity or overlap with any other manuscript (published or unpublished) of which they have personal knowledge.